Enhancing Business Growth Planning For Superior Results

Learn from past growth strategies and close knowing-doing gaps to achieve your business goals

As a new year approaches, most organizations prepare to set their goals for 2013 and draft Marketing and Business Development plans to reflect their renewed aspirations. Progressive organizations ensure that part of that process involves performance evaluation of past plans and close appraisal of what has worked, what hasn’t, and most importantly, why or why not. Let’s focus on the latter as in my experience it is the most constructive part of this practice. To make intelligent and educated decisions about future growth strategies, one must first evaluate the success or failure of past ones by questioning the entire strategy development and delivery chain – from the viability of the adopted strategy, to the selected support tactics and their implementation. Judging end results only is short-sighted, unproductive and insufficient. “It didn’t work - let’s discard it and move on”: it is certainly the easiest and fastest approach to strategy review, and no blame is attached. While there is something to be said about this quick, back of the envelope exercise, I would encourage professionals to dedicate time to go through a thorough cost-benefit analysis, employing objective and tangible metrics.

In doing so, and prior to drafting a sound future business growth plan, there are a number of key questions one must answer. I’d recommend starting with the strategy itself. Was the growth strategy feasible? Had the organization dedicated the necessary resources and time to properly execute it? Had the organization allowed enough flexibility in the strategy for it to absorb sudden and unavoidable internal and external changes? A critical strategy development criterion is that a strategy is viable and consistent with the internal characteristics of the organization (structure, systems, people and culture), as well as supported by the necessary financial and human resources. These questions here are critical regardless of the outcome of the strategy as their answers provide learning points and a platform to develop not only enhanced future growth strategy, but also other key segments of the organization.

Once the strategy is evaluated, consider whether the firm’s tactics had supported the strategy. Had the organization utilized the proper mix and balance of tactics such as general awareness building (branding, PR), engagement (social media), thought leadership (articles, surveys), and targeted relationship building? What is the ROI on the various initiatives and at what level should the organization continue to invest in them, if at all? The second question begs another more fundamental question: does the organization have the proper measuring mechanisms in place to help executives evaluate the effectiveness of the business growth strategy? Have you ever heard the popular saying “You Can't Manage What You Don't Measure”? It is very true and important in determining the efficiency of the business growth platforms employed. The “new normal,” dictated by economic uncertainty and tighter financial margins, no longer allows professional services executives to make decisions on soft and anecdotal data. Today, if an organization is not equipped with systems to track and measure performance tied to certain financial commitments, the leadership team will struggle to justify business growth spending and obtain budget approvals.

Last but not least, consider what percentage of the past business growth plans had been put in action. The chances are there is a substantial gap between the plan and practice. The “80 / 20 rule” rears its ugly head: unfortunately, most firms see 80 percent planning and 20 percent doing. Because this is where “the rubber hits the road” I would encourage professional services organizations and their executives to ponder the reasons for such discrepancy and look for ways to bridge or decrease the plan–do gap. One of the most frequently encountered reasons for such disconnect in the professional services market is the mismatch between the organizational / professionals’ strengths and weaknesses with the selected strategy delivery tactics. This is something easily amendable but often underestimated. Organizations and professionals have different inclinations and strengths when it comes to business growth; firms must foster and leverage those with well aligned tactics instead of introducing uncomfortable ones, leading to resistance and avoidance of plan implementation.

Other reasons attributable to the lack of action and the development of “the knowing – doing gap” deal with timing (talk happens immediately and actions, leading to results, much later), organizational culture (unconditional acceptance of implicit and inherited mental models), management practices and compensation models. The latter two, especially when expressed by fear inducing management and internal competition policies, are often mistaken for motivation and drivers of action. Organizational development research shows the contrary. Organizations which build and nurture a collaborative environment (not internal competitive one) manage to turn knowledge into action, share best practices and drive growth at a sustainable and fast pace. So, when examining what’s inhibiting implementation of past business growth plans and overall, the organization, reflect on the factors outlined above and most importantly, take immediate actions to close the know-do gaps.

To ensure that a comprehensive overview of past business growth strategies is complete and productive I would recommend that executives identify and address at least 3 points for improvement, perhaps one of each of the stages outlined: strategy, tactics and delivery. Once equipped with the knowledge obtained from the review process the team can then develop a new, and improved, strategic business growth plan. Good luck!

© 2010-2013 Copyright Mira Ilieva Leonard / iStile All rights reserved